Influencer Marketing Regulations in Singapore: AIMSG and ASAS Guidelines
Table of Contents
The Regulatory Landscape in Singapore
Singapore has established a clear regulatory framework for influencer marketing regulations singapore brands must follow. Unlike some markets where influencer marketing operates in a regulatory grey zone, Singapore’s guidelines provide specific requirements for disclosure, truthfulness, and consumer protection in sponsored content.
The regulatory framework is primarily self-regulatory, overseen by industry bodies rather than government legislation. However, this should not be mistaken for optional compliance. The advertising industry in Singapore takes self-regulation seriously, and violations can result in sanctions, public complaints, and reputational damage that far exceeds any direct penalties.
Two primary bodies govern influencer marketing in Singapore. The Advertising Standards Authority of Singapore (ASAS) provides the overarching advertising code that applies to all forms of advertising, including influencer content. The Advertising Initiative for Mainstream and Social Media in Singapore (AIMSG) provides more specific guidance for influencer marketing practices.
Beyond these industry bodies, the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) has jurisdiction over online content, and the Consumer Association of Singapore (CASE) can take action on behalf of consumers who are misled by non-compliant advertising. Together, these bodies create a comprehensive regulatory environment that brands must navigate carefully.
For brands investing in influencer marketing in Singapore, understanding and complying with these regulations is not optional — it is a fundamental requirement for professional campaign execution.
ASAS Guidelines for Influencer Marketing
The Singapore Code of Advertising Practice (SCAP), administered by ASAS, establishes the foundational rules that apply to all advertising content, including influencer marketing.

Truthfulness and honesty: All advertising claims — including those made by influencers on behalf of brands — must be truthful, accurate, and substantiated. Influencers may not make claims that the brand itself cannot legally make. If a product has not been clinically tested, the influencer cannot claim it is “clinically proven.” If results vary, testimonials should not present atypical outcomes as typical.
Identification of advertising: The SCAP requires that advertising is clearly identifiable as such. Consumers should not have to work to determine whether content is sponsored. This principle underpins all disclosure requirements — sponsored content must be transparently labelled so that audiences can evaluate recommendations in the context of the commercial relationship.
Protection of consumers: Advertising must not exploit consumers’ lack of knowledge or experience. Influencer content targeting vulnerable groups — children, elderly consumers, or people with health conditions — faces additional scrutiny. Brands must ensure that influencer campaigns do not make misleading claims that exploit consumer trust.
Substantiation of claims: Brands are responsible for ensuring that influencers only make claims that can be substantiated. If an influencer ad-libs a claim during a video — “this cream cured my eczema” — the brand may be liable if the claim cannot be proven. Brief influencers clearly on what claims are permissible and what language to avoid.
Comparative advertising: If influencer content compares your product to competitors, the comparison must be fair, factual, and verifiable. Unsubstantiated superiority claims or misleading comparisons violate ASAS guidelines and may provoke competitor complaints.
The AIMSG Code of Practice
The AIMSG Code of Practice provides specific guidance for influencer marketing that supplements the broader ASAS framework. It addresses the unique dynamics of social media sponsorship and creator partnerships.
Clear disclosure of material connections: The AIMSG code requires influencers to clearly disclose any material connection with brands. Material connections include paid sponsorships, free products, free services, affiliate relationships, employment relationships, and any other arrangement where the influencer receives value from the brand.
Prominent and unambiguous disclosure: Disclosures must be prominent — visible without scrolling, expanding, or clicking. They must be unambiguous — clear language that audiences cannot misinterpret. Burying disclosure in a hashtag string, using vague terms like “thanks to [brand],” or hiding disclosure behind a “see more” link is insufficient.
Creator responsibility: The AIMSG code places responsibility on both the influencer and the brand. Influencers must disclose material connections truthfully. Brands must ensure their campaigns include proper disclosure requirements and must not instruct or incentivise influencers to hide commercial relationships.
Genuine product experience: The code encourages influencers to provide honest, genuine assessments based on actual product experience. Brands should provide influencers with adequate time and access to genuinely use products or services before creating content. Endorsements without genuine experience undermine consumer trust and may violate the code.
Content for minors: Additional restrictions apply to influencer content targeting audiences under 18. Content must not exploit children’s inexperience or credulity, encourage unhealthy behaviours, or pressure children to ask parents to purchase products.
Disclosure Requirements in Practice
Understanding the theory of disclosure is straightforward. Implementing it consistently across multiple creators, platforms, and content formats is the operational challenge.
Recommended disclosure language:
- “Sponsored” or “Paid partnership with [Brand]” — the clearest and most widely accepted disclosure
- “Ad” or “Advertisement” — unambiguous and widely understood
- “Gifted by [Brand]” or “PR gift” — appropriate for gifted products with no posting obligation
- “Affiliate link” — required when the creator earns commission from purchases
Disclosure placement:
- Instagram feed posts: Disclosure in the first line of the caption, before the “more” fold. Using the built-in “Paid partnership” tag is ideal.
- Instagram Stories: Clear text overlay visible throughout the Story frame. The platform’s paid partnership label should be used in addition to text disclosure.
- TikTok videos: Verbal disclosure within the first few seconds plus text overlay. Use TikTok’s branded content toggle for additional transparency.
- YouTube videos: Verbal disclosure at the beginning of the video plus text in the video description. Use YouTube’s paid promotion checkbox.
- LinkedIn posts: Disclosure in the opening text of the post, visible before any expansion is needed.
What does NOT constitute adequate disclosure:
- Hashtags buried at the end of a long hashtag string (#ad lost among 30 hashtags)
- Vague language like “collab,” “thanks to,” or “working with”
- Disclosure only in a location the audience must actively seek (such as a video description without verbal mention)
- Disclosure in a language different from the content language
- Small, hard-to-read text overlays that disappear quickly
Platform-Specific Compliance Rules
Each social media platform has its own branded content policies that layer on top of Singapore’s regulatory requirements. Brands must comply with both.

Instagram: Meta requires the use of the branded content tag (“Paid partnership with [Brand]”) for all sponsored content. This tag appears at the top of posts and Stories, providing clear disclosure. The brand must approve the partnership tag through their account settings. Additionally, Instagram prohibits misleading endorsements and requires compliance with local advertising laws.
TikTok: TikTok requires the branded content toggle for all paid partnerships. This adds a “Paid partnership” label to the video. TikTok’s Community Guidelines prohibit undisclosed sponsored content and misleading claims. The platform actively monitors for compliance and may restrict or remove non-compliant content.
YouTube: YouTube requires creators to check the “paid promotion” box in video settings, which triggers a disclosure overlay at the beginning of the video. Additionally, YouTube’s Terms of Service require verbal disclosure within the video itself. Description-only disclosure is insufficient per YouTube’s standards.
LinkedIn: LinkedIn does not have a specific branded content tag but expects sponsored content to be clearly disclosed within the post text. LinkedIn’s Professional Community Policies prohibit misleading content and undisclosed commercial relationships.
Platform penalties for non-compliance can include content removal, account restrictions, shadowbanning, and in severe cases, account suspension. Ensure your influencer contracts require compliance with both platform policies and Singapore regulations.
Industry-Specific Regulations
Certain industries in Singapore face additional regulatory requirements for influencer marketing beyond the general ASAS and AIMSG frameworks.
Healthcare and pharmaceutical: The Medicines (Advertisement and Sale) Act restricts advertising of certain health products. Influencer content for health supplements, medical devices, and pharmaceutical products must comply with these restrictions, including limitations on therapeutic claims and mandatory disclaimers. The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) actively monitors social media for non-compliant health product advertising.
Financial services: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) regulates advertising of financial products. Influencer content promoting investment products, insurance, loans, or fintech services must include required disclosures about risks, fees, and regulatory status. Financial influencers must not provide specific investment advice without appropriate licensing.
Alcohol: While not prohibited, alcohol advertising faces restrictions including no targeting of minors, no promotion of excessive consumption, and no claims about health benefits. Influencer content featuring alcohol must comply with these restrictions and include appropriate age-gating.
Food and beverages: The Healthier Choice Symbol programme and nutritional claims regulations affect how influencers can describe food products. Claims about health benefits must comply with the Sale of Food Act and associated regulations.
Real estate: Property advertising is regulated by the Council for Estate Agencies (CEA). Influencer content promoting property listings or developments must comply with advertising guidelines including accurate pricing, developer information, and required disclaimers.
Brands in regulated industries should seek legal advice before launching influencer campaigns. The consequences of non-compliance — regulatory fines, content takedowns, and reputational damage — far outweigh the cost of professional legal review.
Ensuring Compliance Across Campaigns
Maintaining compliance across multiple creators, platforms, and campaigns requires systematic processes.
Include compliance requirements in every brief: Your creative brief should specify the exact disclosure language, placement, and format required. Do not assume influencers know the rules — provide clear instructions for every campaign.
Add compliance clauses to contracts: Every influencer agreement should include clauses requiring compliance with ASAS guidelines, AIMSG code, platform policies, and any industry-specific regulations. Include the brand’s right to request content modifications or takedowns for compliance reasons.
Review all content before publication: Implement a content review process that checks for proper disclosure, truthful claims, and regulatory compliance before content goes live. This review should cover captions, spoken content, visual claims, and platform tags.
Maintain a compliance checklist: Create a standardised checklist that reviewers use for every piece of influencer content. Include disclosure presence and prominence, claim accuracy, platform tag usage, industry-specific requirements, and any campaign-specific restrictions.
Train your team and agency: Ensure everyone involved in influencer campaigns — internal team members and agency partners — understands Singapore’s regulatory requirements. Regular training updates keep compliance top of mind as regulations evolve.
Monitor published content: After content goes live, monitor for compliance on an ongoing basis. Creators may edit captions, update descriptions, or create additional content that needs review. Periodic audits of live influencer content catch issues before they escalate.
Compliance should be viewed as a brand protection investment, not an administrative burden. Non-compliant campaigns risk regulatory action, media scrutiny, consumer complaints, and lasting reputational damage. Professional compliance practices are integral to a mature digital marketing operation.
What Enforcement Actions Teach About Safe Influencer Marketing
Regulations are easier to understand through the lens of what actually goes wrong. Over the past three years, ASAS and the Advertising Standards Authority of Singapore have upheld complaints across several recurring patterns — and these are where most brands quietly slip up.

- Missing or buried disclosure. The most common upheld complaint: #ad, #sponsored or the commercial relationship disclosed only in caption footer, hashtags buried below the “more” fold, or disclosed verbally in a video but not in the caption. ASAS expects the disclosure to be prominent and understood at the point of first viewing.
- Efficacy claims on regulated products. Skincare, supplements, health and fitness products attract the tightest scrutiny under HSA and ASAS. Creators saying “this cleared my acne in a week” or “I lost 10kg using this” without qualified context repeatedly triggers upheld complaints — even when the creator believed the statement personally.
- Financial product marketing without qualification. MAS expects financial advisers — and content that functions as financial advice — to be licensed. Influencer campaigns for investment platforms, crypto, or structured products that tell viewers “you should invest in X” cross a line the creator often does not realise exists.
- Misleading price or promotion claims. “Only $99 today” when the product also sells at $99 the next day, or “50% off RRP” where RRP is inflated, are common upheld complaints under the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act (CPFTA). The influencer and the brand can both be held accountable.
- Children-targeted content without safeguards. Campaigns targeting or using under-18 creators need clear parental consent and content standards. ASAS has issued several reminders on this, and it is a priority enforcement area in 2026.
The pattern is clear: enforcement focuses on consumer harm. If a reasonable Singapore consumer could be misled, misunderstand the commercial nature of the content, or make a decision based on unqualified claims, the campaign is at risk — regardless of how “organic” the post feels. Brief your creators with these patterns in mind, and keep written proof of the brief and approval workflow in case you need to demonstrate due diligence.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is influencer marketing regulated in Singapore?
Yes. Influencer marketing is subject to the Singapore Code of Advertising Practice (administered by ASAS), the AIMSG Code of Practice, platform-specific policies, and industry-specific regulations. While enforcement is primarily self-regulatory, non-compliance carries real consequences including sanctions and reputational damage.
What happens if an influencer does not disclose a paid partnership?
The brand and influencer may face complaints to ASAS, negative media coverage, platform penalties (content removal, account restrictions), and loss of audience trust. Repeat or serious violations may result in ASAS sanctions and potential referral to government authorities.
Do gifted products need to be disclosed?
Yes. Any material connection between the brand and influencer — including gifted products — must be disclosed. Even when there is no obligation to post, content created about gifted products should include disclosure such as “Gifted” or “PR package.”
Can influencers make health claims about products?
Only claims that the product can legally make under Singapore’s health product regulations. Influencers must not claim therapeutic benefits for products that are not registered as medicines. Brands must brief influencers clearly on permissible claims and prohibited language.
Who is responsible for compliance — the brand or the influencer?
Both parties share responsibility. Brands must include compliance requirements in briefs and contracts, review content before publication, and monitor published content. Influencers must follow disclosure guidelines and make truthful claims. In practice, brands face greater scrutiny because they control the campaign and benefit commercially.
What disclosure is required for affiliate links?
Affiliate relationships must be clearly disclosed. Language like “Affiliate link — I may earn a commission if you purchase” is appropriate. The disclosure should be visible before the audience encounters the affiliate link. Undisclosed affiliate links violate both ASAS guidelines and platform policies.
Are there penalties for non-compliant influencer marketing in Singapore?
ASAS can issue public reprimands, require content modifications or removal, and refer cases to government authorities. Platforms may remove content, restrict accounts, or ban repeat violators. Industry-specific regulators (MAS, HSA) can impose fines and legal penalties for violations of their respective regulations. Beyond formal penalties, reputational damage from publicised non-compliance can be the most costly consequence.
How do Singapore regulations compare to other countries?
Singapore’s framework is comparable to the UK’s ASA guidelines and aligns broadly with FTC requirements in the US. The emphasis on clear, prominent disclosure is consistent across major markets. Singapore’s self-regulatory approach is well-enforced relative to many regional markets, making compliance particularly important for brands operating here.
Who enforces influencer marketing rules in Singapore?
ASAS (Advertising Standards Authority of Singapore) administers the Singapore Code of Advertising Practice and investigates upheld complaints. HSA (Health Sciences Authority) enforces advertising rules for health products, supplements, therapeutics and cosmetics. MAS oversees financial services marketing and adviser-style content. The CPFTA (Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act) underpins enforcement around misleading or unfair practices. In most cases, enforcement starts with a consumer complaint to ASAS, which can then refer matters to the relevant regulator or recommend corrective action.
Do I need written contracts with my influencers in Singapore?
Functionally yes, even if not legally mandatory for every engagement. A written brief that documents disclosure requirements, claims that can and cannot be made, approval workflow, and the obligations of both parties protects you if a complaint arises. Brands that can demonstrate they briefed creators on compliance and retained approval rights are typically treated more favourably if something goes wrong. Gifting-only engagements with no monetary payment still require disclosure — having a brief is the cleanest way to evidence that the creator was instructed.
Are disclosure requirements the same across Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube in Singapore?
The principle is identical — the commercial relationship must be clear, upfront and unmissable — but the implementation differs by platform. Instagram requires the native “Paid partnership” tag plus written disclosure in the caption (not just hashtag). TikTok needs the branded content toggle enabled plus in-video or caption disclosure. YouTube requires “Includes paid promotion” to be declared in the video and the description should also contain the disclosure. Platform-native tools alone are not sufficient; you still need a clear textual disclosure your audience would actually read.



